|
|
|
Research Center |
|
|
|
In the
Goldfields |
|
|
|
|
AZO's Detecting Tips |
|
|
Are You Walking Over Nuggets? |
|
Tips
on coil swing speed |
Bob
Dansie
I often get calls and e-mails from
beginners who despite many trips to
known gold areas just can't find any
nuggets. They are going to patches where
others find gold but still come back
empty handed. I almost always know what
I will find when they join me for a
lesson. Almost without exception I see a
wild, fast, uncontrolled coil swing.
This will work just fine for large
shallow targets; bullets, nails and the
like respond just fine to this approach.
So will a large shallow nugget. But how
many of these are left on a really
hammered patch? How do some operators
find gold day after day on hammered
patches? The answer: A slow, calm,
plodding approach!
With a PI detector a weak, tiny, or deep
target will not be heard with the fast
swing. It's that simple. Rapid, jerky
movements can also cause false signals.
A very small nugget or a deeply buried
one will respond far more clearly if the
coil is being moved VERY slowly. Being a
motion detector it has to be moving a
little. In fact a target will fade away
rapidly if the coil comes to a total
stop over it. But just like with
medications, more isn't better. I can
make a weak signal totally disappear
just by increasing my swing speed.
Increasing swing speed can also increase
the signal response on hot rocks, hot
ground, and black sand. I can make the
signal response virtually disappear on
these unwanted “targets” by drastically
slowing my swing speed. On the other
hand, a good metal target will increase
in signal response!
This is where the slow swing comes into
play on a hammered patch. You are
looking for that nugget that got missed
by dozens of others who were there
before you. The chances of this
happening increase if the ground has
some difficult factors like those
mentioned above. By decreasing the
unwanted signals and increasing the
wanted signals you will hear that faint
signal that got passed up. The real pros
that use this method often don't even
actually swing the detector. The coil is
placed on the ground or very close to
it, and poked and guided around
obstacles. Taken to extremes like this,
virtually nothing is missed and I use it
often on the once very rich patches that
have really been hit hard. It might not
pay huge financial rewards but if it
gets you that first nugget it can be a
real eye opener.
Finding the first nugget no matter how
small is the most important milestone
for anyone who has recently gotten
involved with the hobby. Going home with
a nugget in your pocket will make you
love your detector and the dear
wife/husband may quit calling you a
fool.
These photos are of some nuggets I found
over the last few days using the
“creep-and-crawl” method on some of the
Bradshaw’s most pounded patches. The 3
smallest combined wouldn't even register
on my digital scales which take 1/10
gram to activate!
 |
|
 |
Now we'll get to the exceptions. When
hunting for new virgin patches you
simply can't cover enough country
scrubbing your coil on the ground. In
desert situations a new patch will
usually have some nuggets sitting very
close to the surface. It will often have
some large nuggets in the 1/4 ounce
range or bigger. There will be some
“sitting ducks”. The sitting ducks are
what you are looking for while patch
hunting. These will respond well with a
ground covering swing. A few years ago I
stumbled on to one of these. It wasn't
really a patch in the normal sense but a
vast area of gullies with nuggets in
almost every one of them. One gully in
the area had been extensively worked by
the old-timers, but the rest of them had
been totally ignored. I suspect that
this rich gully was so rich that they
never bothered to dry-wash the
surrounding gullies that were not so
rich. Since these poorer gullies weren't
messed with the trash was almost
nonexistent. Once I realized what the
situation was, I hit these surrounding
gullies very quickly swinging only for
the sitting ducks because I knew that it
was only a matter of time before someone
else stumbled onto the area.
By taking the sitting ducks I knew that
someone exploring at a searching pace
would be likely to pass through the area
empty handed. I could then return later
and pick up the smaller and deeper ones
at my leisure. It worked very well and I
still return to the area and get nuggets
on a regular basis despite the fact that
there are now club claims in the area.
As far as I can tell, no one has
stumbled onto it. This now has become a
pounded patch and the low and slow
approach is the only way to pick any
nuggets out of it. The few nuggets that
remain are either deep or very small and
I really have to work for them.
The beginner with no idea about geology
or indicators or how to recognize tell
tale signs of old-timer activity has a
slim chance of finding a new patch with
only blind luck working for him/her. It
does happen but it's akin to hitting the
lottery. They are far more likely to
find gold by carefully working some
known patches. Once they have seen
several of these patches then he/she
will have a good idea of what to look
for and with a few nuggets in the poke
will have the confidence to start
exploring for a new patch of their own.
Those who really pay attention to what
productive ground looks like and are
really observant of their surroundings
catch on fast. Those with their head in
the clouds, wandering around day
dreaming, or worrying about problems at
work or home will have a tough time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lightening the Load: Weight and Leverage
Modifications
R.K. Patrick
I had a real hobby threatening problem
with my shoulder after an over zealous
all day outing, swinging one of the
heavier coils made for the Minelab
detectors. Actually, I had to learn how
to detect with my other arm after that
day. It took months before I was able to
even tuck in my shirt normally. Really
enjoy this sport, so I needed to do
something.
Started out thinking that the over all
weight was the problem. So like any
machinist I started cutting weight off
the detector. After cutting as much
material off of every part I could with
out destroying its integrity, I removed
every piece of metal between the coil
and the green button on my GP3500, and
replaced it with plastic, except the
coil wire. In the process coil wire
clips on the top corners of the control
box where removed. To show how serious I
was I even poked lightening holes in the
control box feet that may have saved
1/10 of a gram. I even purchased a
fiberglass upper shaft.
|
 |
At that point I had not accomplished
much; all told the weight was reduced by
a shade under a 1/2 lb. While
reassembling the detector umpteen times
I noticed that with the wire clips
removed I could slide the control box
closer to or farther from the coil.
That’s when the lights came on. It was
not the over all weight that broke me;
it was the leveraged weight of that
heavy coil. Balance is what was needed.
From that point on it was just a matter
of transferring weight. Using the bottom
of the handle grip as the pivot or
balancing point every gram possible was
transferred to the control box side of
the handle. That lead to a little
fiberglass attachment tube I made that
allows the control box to be slid away
from the coil in seconds. This
adjustment allows one to achieve the
preferred balance weight, after
switching to a different weight coil
without changing the over all weight of
the detector. I made a test fixture and
purchased a digital scale to gather
weight information on different coils
and configuration. That turned out to be
just a lot of technical paper work.
Bottom line it does what it is supposed
to do; it lightens load!
|
 |
| |
Posted below are a few pictures of the
end results of my efforts. Still have a
few minor ideas to try, but this will
give you an idea where I’m headed. Some
of the modifications are very subtle and
you may need to look hard. I found the
total weight is important, but not
nearly as important as balanced weight.
Using only an attachment such as this
would help in leveraged weight on a
stock unit. This modification allows you
to stay in the field detecting longer
with less fatigue. Sounds like I’m
selling something doesn’t it? I’m not.
| |
 |
|
 |
Things brought to light along the way.
You can make a fully dressed GP3500
weigh less than 6 pounds. For every
pound added to the coil it increases the
leveraged weight by approximately 4
pounds. It does make a difference how
far away the handle is separated from
the armrest. The farther the two are
away from each other, the lighter a coil
will seem. It does make a difference how
close the coil is to the handle, the
closer the lighter the coil will seem.
Stock Velco ties are 4 times
heavier that a small zip tie cut to
size. Normal electrical tape weighs 1/10
gram per inch. There are plastic
replacement screws for every steel screw
on the detector. The list goes on and
on. Is this information for everyone?
Nah! It’s only for those that can get
some good out of it. Hope it helps
someone - it did me! |
|
|
|
|
|
Building a Cover for the NF Super-Lites
Bob Dansie

Everyone who has one of the Nugget
Finder Super-Lite coils seems to
love them, but there is always the
complaint about debris buildup on
top of them, same for the Coiltek
UFO coils. I also found this
annoying and came up with this
solution. I bought an extra coil
cover and cut a hole the shape of
the mounting bracket and trimmed the
edges and placed it on top of the
coil using a few dabs of “Shoe-Goo”
to hold it in place then taped the
coil cover in place. It added very
little weight and solved the problem
and I can now dump the dirt on top
of my coil for final retrieval of
the nugget. I sealed around the
bracket to keep dirt and debris out.
Here's a picture of the finished
product.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chasing Gold on Bedrock
Chris Gholson
Bedrock is essentially an exposed
portion of the Earth’s crust and comes
in all sorts of varieties. Sometimes it
is schist, other time granite or
volcanic, and sometimes it is not even a
true rock, but rather a false bottom
like caliche. Whatever it may be, it is
a good place to search with a detector
because the gold will almost always be
within a machines’ depth range. Hunting
bedrock requires different techniques
than regular dirt because there are many
possible hiding places for a nugget.
Even after the signal is pinpointed a
prospector cannot be 100% certain where
it is lodged within a crack. If the
bedrock is highly weathered it will
typically break apart easy. If it is
composed of a harder rock it can be a
chore.
|
 |
|
 |
Here are two items I always bring along
when targeting bedrock: 1) a strong rare
earth magnet, and 2) a flathead
screwdriver. A powerful magnet is
brilliant for quickly removing ferrous
junk like wire fragments, boot tacks and
bits of decomposed cans. It saves a lot
of precious detecting time and is easy
to use. After you have most of the sand
and gravel out of a crack, simply rub
the magnet into the hole. I attach mine
to the end of my pick, so it also works
as I’m digging. Just be careful if you
carry your pick on your side and your
wallet in a back pocket. I’ve wiped out
more than one credit card this way! The
trustee flathead is another tool I’ve
put to good use. It is much easier to
maneuver in tight bedrock cracks than a
pick head, plus you can take your time
making sure a nugget does not get
damaged. Don’t use an expensive one,
instead go for a “junker” in your
toolbox or pick up a cheapo from the
hardware store. I have lost many of them
over the years after digging up a nugget
and in my excitement walking away. Now I
leave it stuck to the magnet on my pick
(see picture). Another inexpensive
device you can use while bedrock hunting
is a straw. That’s right – a straw! Grab
a few from McDonalds the next time you
swing in for a burger. They are great
for blowing out sand filled cracks. It
might seem goofy, but it works!
Most of the gold I’ve pulled from
exposed bedrock has been small (2 grams
and under), but it is still one of my
favorite places to detect. Sure chances
of finding a big lump on bedrock are
slim; even so I get a real charge from
picking tiny bits in between the folds
of rock in a gully. If anyone else has
tips along these lines they’d like to
share please feel free to add. Good luck
out there! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Building a Coil Cable Stabilizer
Bob Dansie
Ever since I first got interested in
beeping for gold I noticed that I often
would get a false signal when the coil
wire was bumped or moved near the
connector going into the control box.
This problem continued even with the PIs
and seems to get worse as the detector
and coil get older. I think that this is
because the constant movement however
small eventually damages the wire and
the connector. I have had several Emails
asking me how this problem could be
eliminated. When I recently had several
coil connectors get progressively
touchier, I decided to put my mind to
work on it. Digging around in my
organizer boxes in my workshop I came up
with some parts that looked like could
be made to work. Once I had it all
together I felt sure that it would go a
long way toward eliminating the problem.
This first photo shows the parts I used
which are available at any hardware
store and a lot of you might have them
in your shop already.
|
 |
| |
|
Here's what it looks like
assembled. |
|
 |
This now will clamp on the shaft. If it
doesn't clamp on firmly you may have to
squeeze the 3/4" EMT clamp with a pair
of pliers and try it again. Here it is
in place and the coil cable will slip
into the Co-ax clamp.

I decided to go one step further and
added another of the nylon clamps to the
bottom of the handle bracket. This was
done by removing the forward tightening
bolt, sliding the clamp into the slot
and then replacing the bolt. Another
photo.

The last photo shows the finished
product from the bottom.

By leaving the nylon clamps open coil
changes can still be easily done. If you
look at the third photo you will see
that the cord now has a straight shot
into the control box plug with no side
pressure and will be very difficult to
move out of position. This may not seem
like a real big deal to some people but
I don't like hearing false signals and
having to retighten my coil connector
all the time. I am sure that it will
prolong the life of the wire and
connector and without the falsing or
possible temporary loss of a good
connection might just mean more nuggets
in my poke. For a cost of about 50 cents
and a few minutes of my time , I think
it was well worth doing.---Bob |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ground Balancing the Minelab GP
Detectors
Bob Dansie
I have run into quite a few GP owners who are still a
little confused about the importance of
a perfect ground balance. I have even
run into a few who think that hitting
the tune button is ground balancing the
detector. Most successful GP operators
choose to run in fixed and there are
good reasons for that. The first thing I
do when I start hunting is to get away
from the car and check the ground for
trash targets. This is very important
because any metal target in range of the
coil will affect the ground balance.
Place your finger on the Track/ fixed
switch. Starting in the fixed mode start
moving the coil up and down rapidly.
(only an inch or 2). While doing this,
switch to track while continuing to pump
the coil up and down. After a few up and
down strokes the threshold will smooth
out to where you get no variation in
tone between the up stroke and the down
stroke. Switch immediately back to fixed
at this point. Once you get the hang of
it it only takes a second or two. I do
it one more time and at this point I am
sure that the detector is perfectly
balanced to the ground. I am then ready
to hunt. As you move from one area to
another you may notice your threshold
wandering a little. The detector is
telling you that you have moved to an
area with different mineralization. Just
go through the ground balance procedure
again. I do this as I am walking and
swinging and don't even miss a step. In
most areas you will seldom have to do
this. Even if my detector sounds like it
is properly ground balanced, I
periodically re-ground balance. If your
detector is out of ground balance you
will miss targets!
Some folks
choose to run in tracking which will
work fine in flat clear areas. The
problem with running in tracking is that
if you have to raise your coil several
inches off the ground to clear a rock or
other obstruction the tracking feature
will automatically try to track to the
air and when returned to the search
height will be confused for as many as
ten steps or so. You are out of balance!
To speed up the re-tracking process
switch to fixed then back to track. This
forces it to instantly re-ground
balance. If you are running in tracking
and get a target you set the detector on
the ground while digging usually. This
again throws it out of balance. Now when
you check your hole and pile you lift it
off the ground several inches. It is
really confused now and if the target is
tiny you may lose it completely. My
advice to those who choose to run in
track is to move the coil a foot or so
to the side of the target and reground
balance then leave in the fixed mode
throughout the retrieval process. You
won't lose those tiny targets. I often
find small nuggets beside fresh dig
holes and I am sure that this explains
why they were left behind. Running in
tracking can help smooth out noisy
ground and cut down on hot rock noise.
In tracking a suspected hot rock can be
checked by swinging over it several
times listening for a rapidly
diminishing signal. If the signal
remains strong and doesn't diminish
after 3or 4 swings start digging. Most
ironstone hot rocks can be eliminated in
this way but some of the basalt (lava)
can't. Just remember that if you are
lifting the coil off the ground
frequently, then running in tracking
mode can cost you nuggets unless you
switch to fixed then back to track after
each time it is raised more than a few
inches. A consistent coil height becomes
much more important while running in
tracking mode. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Coil Setup: Swingarm Modifications
STAN WARD
Here's a tip for setting up your GP/SD
for using a large coil. I've found that
even using a bungee sometimes doesn't
help much when swinging a larger coil
all day, so I recently purchased a
swing-arm setup. The first thing I
noticed when I pulled it out of the
package, was that the lower part that
attaches 6-8 inches above the coil was
held together with two METAL bolts/nuts!
Fortunately, whoever designed this unit
made the holes the exact same size as
the nylon bolts that hold your coil on
the shaft. A few minor mods later and I
now have a unit that is usable and
doesn't contain any metal near the coil.
First, I have to say that I replaced the
original shaft that came with my GP
Extreme with an extra long fully
fiberglass one, so you may notice that
it is a little different then your stock
shaft. It's still close enough that
these mods should work on a stock shaft.
I have 10 coils that I use in the field
and have 6 lower shafts that I use and
two of these are the heavy duty, extra
length shafts. I used one of these to
mount my swing arm on, and this way I
can leave it set up and just put the
shaft/coil on my unit just like any
other lower shaft.
The first thing I did was to remove the
metal bolts from the swing-arm. The one
that attaches to the arm itself is a
small one, but there is a plastic insert
that is easily removed, and the
remaining hole is the same size as the
nylon bolts for your coil. This first
picture shows the insert about halfway
out along with the original metal bolt.
I
This second picture shows the end that
attaches to the shaft. It has a molded
insert that fits the metal bolt and also
is the exact same size as the head of a
nylon bolt. The inner diameter of the
attachment was slightly larger then my
shaft diameter, so I cut the end off of
a 12 pack of beer and used it as a
spacer wrapped around the shaft.

This third picture is after assembly and
shows how the retaining clip can be used
to hold the shaft & swingarm together
for storage.

And this last picture shows the final
assembly at the upper end of the shaft.
The retaining clip snaps onto the shaft
and holds the swingarm handle in place
when not in use.

|
|
|
|
|