|
One of the questions I get asked most
frequently from new metal detector owners
is, “What type of coil should I use?” This
is a great question, but a difficult one to
answer since there are many variables
involved. Unfortunately there is no perfect
coil. A particular type may work really well
in one area, but perform poorly in another.
Serious detectorists are aware of this and
choose their coil accordingly. Before we go
into the methods used for choosing the right
coil, let’s first discuss what a coil is and
what role it plays in metal detection.
The coil, also referred to as a search coil,
loop, head, or foot, is the device connected
to the bottom of a metal detector. They are
most often made of plastic and can be round,
elliptical or square, and come in a variety
of sizes. Some are made exclusively for use
on land; others are designed to be used
underwater. The coil is basically an
antenna, and its primary job is to set-up,
transmit and receive the electromagnetic
field. As electrical current circulates
through the metal windings inside this
antenna, an invisible electromagnetic field
is generated and flows out into the
surrounding medium (i.e., air, rock, soil,
etc.). Whenever this field comes into
contact with a piece of metal, tiny
circulating currents called “eddy currents”
begin to flow across the surface of the
metal object. This phenomenon causes a
distortion or a power loss in the original
electromagnetic field, and in turn, triggers
an audible or metered response alerting the
operator that he/she has just crossed over
something metal. All metal detectors need
some type of coil in order to function.
The way in which the wires are wound inside
the coil will greatly influence its
performance. The pattern of windings or
“configuration” helps detectorists classify
their coils. The most popular names in use
today are either Monoloop or
Double D. Monoloops consist of a single
circular winding of wire which acts as both
the transmit and receive coil. Monoloops
have excellent sensitivity and depth
capabilities, but may behave erratically in
highly mineralized ground. Double D coils
consist of two separate windings of wire
that resemble two letter D’s placed
back-to-back. One winding transmits, while
the other receives. They do not penetrate as
deeply as the monoloops, but they are able
to ignore a vast majority of ground
mineralization. It is for this reason that
Double D coils are the preferred choice for
working highly conductive or “noisy” soils,
such as those found in the Australian
Outback. They are stable and quiet and keep
the operator from having to dig many false
signals generated by both soil and hot
rocks. Monoloop coils offer superior depth
and sensitivity over DD coils, but are
better suited for milder ground conditions,
like those found in most of North America.
Now that we have a better idea of what a
coil is, how it functions, and the types of
configurations, we can now discuss what
factors influence coil selection. There are
five important factors which must be taken
into consideration. These are: 1) ground
mineralization, 2) terrain, 3) overburden
depth, 4) relative target size, and 5)
operator experience.
Ground Mineralization:
Metal detectorists often refer to highly
mineralized ground as being “hot”. When they
speak of the ground in this manner they are
simply referring to the various conductive
and magnetic properties it exhibits, not
temperature. Many soils, especially those
found in the goldfields, are composed of
rock, soil, sand and clays that contain
small grains of iron-bearing minerals. These
minerals are predominately the iron oxides:
magnetite, hematite, limonite, maghemite and
lepidocrocite. All of these oxides exhibit a
varying degree of ferromagnetism.
Ferromagnetic substances can be magnetized
by being exposed to another electromagnetic
field, like the one produced by the coil.
Any material that will allow current to flow
will set up a secondary magnetic field. This
often causes the detector to receive a
signal from the ground itself, which may be
much stronger than the signal produced from
a metallic target. It is this natural
property that causes the ground in highly
mineralized areas to become noisy or “hot”.
If the area you are detecting causes the
detector to become unstable or unusually
erratic and can not be remedied by re-ground
balancing, then chances are it is heavily
mineralized. Soils that are stained a dark
red or orange are typically noisier than
those brown or grayish in color. Even though
some depth penetration must be sacrificed,
these areas are best worked with a Double D
coil. On the other hand, if a satisfactory
ground balance is achieved and the detector
is running fairly smooth in the area you
have selected, definitely opt for a Monoloop
coil. Personally, I always try a monoloop
coil first, and then if the ground proves
too noisy, I switch over to a Double D.
Terrain:
By terrain I am referring to the
characteristics of the land you are metal
detecting. The presence or absence of brush,
trees, grass, and rocks, as well as the
gradient of the land will largely dictate
what size and shape of coil you use. Areas
that are wide open and flat with relatively
few obstructions will allow us to swing a
much larger diameter coil. Areas that are
narrow, rocky or clogged with vegetation
will force us to use a smaller diameter
coil. For flat open spaces with relatively
little trash, I recommend using the largest
coil you can swing, such as a 16”, 20” or
25”. For tight spots such as a narrow brush
filled gully, I would suggest something in
the 8”, 10”, 11”, or 14” range. I also find
myself choosing round coils for open ground,
and elliptical coils for tight work where
the going is rough. Elliptical coils are
also better for getting into tight nooks &
crannies such as those found beneath rocks
and under cactus.
Overburden Depth:
Coils come in a wide array of sizes and will
most definitely affect the performance of
your metal detector. The smallest I have
ever seen measured not much bigger than a
doughnut, others are so massive they must be
carted around on a trolley! Generally
speaking, smaller diameter coils find
smaller targets, but do not penetrate very
deeply. Large coils will locate bigger
targets at greater depths, but aren’t well
suited for hunting small targets.
Small coils (i.e., 14” or less in diameter)
should be used to hunt shallow areas, where
the operator knows most of the targets will
be fairly close to the surface (1-foot or
less). Large coils (i.e., 16” or more in
diameter) should be used to hunt areas where
the operator knows most of the targets are
likely to be deep (1-foot and beyond). I
should also mention that that round coils
tend to offer slightly better depth than
elliptical coils, whereas elliptical coils
tend to offer slightly better sensitivity.
If you are having trouble determining the
overburden depth in your area, I suggest you
select a larger coil to ensure you are not
only getting maximum penetration, but ground
coverage as well.
Target Size:
A detectorist must select their coil based
not only on ground mineralization, terrain,
and overburden depth, but also on the
relative size of the desired targets. This
is especially crucial for the electronic
gold prospector since gold nuggets tend to
be fairly small. To give you an example,
about two years ago I discovered a virgin
nugget patch in the mountains of Arizona
using my metal detector. After many weeks of
hard work, my wife and I pulled over 1,000
nuggets off it. It was an incredible find,
but almost all of the nuggets were tiny; not
weighing more than 1-gram. Actually, the
very first piece I unearthed which pointed
me in the right direction only weighed a
mere 0.2-gram. I tell this story because had
I been swinging a very large coil I would
have likely missed that first nugget and
ultimately the patch. If a person is seeking
tiny objects I always recommend choosing a
smaller diameter coil. They may not
penetrate as deeply as their larger
relatives, but their ability to “sniff” out
minute fragments of metal is unmatched. When
you need maximum sensitivity, think small
coils.
Operator Experience:
This category is included because the amount
of detecting experience a person has, should
to some extent, influence their coil
selection. We have already discussed the
“mineral canceling” properties of the Double
D coils. They are smooth, stable, quiet and
ward off excessive false signals caused by
both soil and hot rocks, and are less likely
to frustrate a new detector owner. It is no
coincidence that most metal detectors are
supplied standard with a Double D coil in
the 10” to 12” range. Monoloop coils offer
distinct advantages but they are more
susceptible to ground noise, and therefore
take a bit more practice. If you are new to
the hobby, I suggest running a Double D coil
during your initial break-in. Once you have
got a few weeks experience under your belt,
definitely consider adding a monoloop to
your coil arsenal.
Many people I encounter want to swing big
coils for the added depth and ground
coverage, but also, well…because they look
cool. Large diameter coils can and do work
wonders on supposedly hunted out sites, but
they are not without some disadvantages.
They are more awkward to swing, somewhat
heavier, and more difficult to pinpoint
with. Like the monoloop coils, I suggest
that a newcomer to the hobby stick with
coils 14” in diameter and smaller until they
have had a chance to become more
familiarized with their machine. Once they
are able to swing the machine for several
hours without becoming overly fatigued and
have mastered pinpointing; then it is time
to seriously consider a larger coil.
No one search coil can do it all. What works
beautifully in the deserts of Nevada will
most likely flounder on a Civil War
battlefield in Georgia. The coil is an
integral part of any metal detector; having
the potential to enhance or hamper its
effectiveness. Seasoned detectorists know
this, which is why they change their coils
to suit their environment. They experiment
often to learn what each is capable of, and
typically have a collection of coils
differing in both size and configuration -
you should too. Time spent learning how
different coils influence your metal
detector’s performance will only help to
increase the odds of a success hunt. I
wish all of you the very best of luck with
your detecting!
For additional information on metal
detecting, please visit the author’s website
at
www.ArizonaOutback.com.
References:
Garrett, C. (1995). Modern Metal
Detectors. Dallas, TX: Ram Publishing
Company.
Rowan, M. and Lahr, W. (1995). How Metal
Detectors Work. Sweet Home, OR: White’s
Electronics, Inc. |