|
|
|
Research Center |
|
|
|
In the
Goldfields |
|
|
|
|
Lost Treasure
Magazine |
|
Issue: November 2001 |
|
By: Chris Gholson |
There’s no gold
left in those old nugget
patches! The surface gold was
cleaned out long ago by VLFs in
the 1980s, and the deeper ones
were plucked out by the SDs in
the mid ‘90s. Say that to the
new owners of a GP extreme and
they’ll just rattle their pokes
at you and smile – or perhaps
the smarter ones won’t.
Minelab’s newest
addition, the GP extreme, comes
in its own heavy-duty, plastic
carrying case that has an inner
skin molded to the shape of the
detector’s components. It is
supplied with both 11” and 18”
extreme coils, metallic blue
control box, armrest, shafts,
handle assembly, 6 volt/10 AH
battery, curly power cable, 110
volt charger, 12 volt vehicle
charger, 600 ohm Telex
headphones, battery pack and
instruction manual. While its
overall appearance is
ergonomically similar to the SDs,
you can rest assured that this
is not merely a 2200d wrapped up
in a fancy new package.
In fact, it is
the first gold detector to
utilize Dual Voltage Technology
(DVT). This new technology was
developed based on the existing
Bi-Polar technology used in
their military mine detectors.
DVT, refers to changes in
voltage used to create the
electro-magnetic field,
transmitted by the coil into the
ground. It has nothing to do
with the power supply. The
magnetic fields, which are
transmitted by a metal detector,
can ‘magnetically-saturate’ the
ground, especially if the coil
is held close to the surface.
Minelab discovered that by
applying two different voltages
to the transmit coil they were
able to cancel out many of the
signals caused by this magnetic
saturation. Thereby improving
the detector’s sensitivity,
depth and its ability to balance
out mineralization.
Features:
Listed below is a
very brief description of some
of the more important features
found on the new GP extreme. The
Rx setting changes the
characteristics of the new
‘extreme’ coils by altering
their transmit and receive
fields, giving them the ability
to change their configuration
pattern with the simple flip of
a switch. When the Rx switch is
set in the Normal position the
coil will function as a
conventional Double D. If the Rx
switch is set in the E (Enhance)
position the coil will
essentially function as a
‘pseudo’ monoloop. By this I
mean, it will exhibit some of
the characteristics of a
traditional monoloop coil. When
operated in this mode the GP’s
detection depth is still good,
but sensitivity on the right
hand side of the coil is
virtually non-existent. The
Cancel feature changes the
electro-magnetic field of the
coil so that it is relatively
stable in areas of electrical
interference. This feature is
especially useful when hunting
near power lines, electrical
fences or under poor atmospheric
conditions.
The Boost
feature allows the operator to
select the type of processing
and filtering used while
hunting, thereby enhancing the
signals produced by different
types of targets. Shallow
amplifies signals from small,
faint targets near the surface.
N (Normal) can be used in most
any soil conditions. This
setting does not boost any
signals, regardless of size or
depth. Deep may be used when
searching for large nuggets in
highly mineralized ground at
depth.
The Soil
feature optimizes the detector
for different soil conditions
and targets by changing the
signal processing. This switch
offers three different settings:
Normal, Sensitive and Salt. The
Normal (N) setting may be used
in all types of ground, ranging
from lightly to highly
mineralized soils. This is my
preferred setting for the Soil
switch. The Sensitive setting is
useful when searching for tiny,
shallow gold nuggets. The Salt
setting enables the GP to search
in areas containing large
amounts of conductive salts.
Although I have not had an
opportunity to test the GP on
the salt, I have talked with
several professional Australian
hunters who are impressed with
its capabilities. My advice is
this; unless you are hunting the
dry salt lakes of the outback
avoid using this setting, as it
reduces sensitivity towards
small nuggets. You will find
that the American goldfields are
much less mineralized and using
this setting is largely
unnecessary.
Like its
predecessor, the SD 2200d, the
GP extreme is also equipped with
automatic ground balancing (AGB).
The Balance switch, which
controls the ground balance
function, is located on the
front panel. Unlike manual
ground balancing detectors, the
GP, when placed in the Tracking
mode will continually adjust to
minimize the effects of ground
mineralization. It also has the
ability to be dialed or ‘tuned’
in for a particular piece of
ground when placed in the Fixed
position. Strangely enough, it
has come to my attention that
the AGB feature often works too
well. Tiny or deeply buried gold
nuggets are often difficult to
hear because of the feeble
signal they emit. Usually these
signals are in the form of a
small dip or rise in the
threshold level, and are often
so weak they’re nearly
impossible to distinguish from
the background noise.
Unfortunately the
GP, because of its improved
canceling ability, may interpret
these subtle responses as being
nothing more than ground noise
and attempt to balance them out.
This problem can be remedied by
leaving the machine in the Fixed
position after it has been
properly balanced. Based on my
own findings and the comments of
others, the general consensus
towards the Balance feature is
the following. If the ground is
quiet to medium mineralized
there is a sensitivity advantage
if the Fixed position is used
for searching. Not to mention,
the machine will not
accidentally balance out those
faint murmurs. If the ground is
variably mineralized and noisy,
then Tracking is the preferred
position.
The GP is
outfitted with an Iron
Discriminate feature, which
allows the user to select
between a Disc or an All Metal
mode. In the All Metal mode, the
detector will respond to all
types of metallic targets,
including ferrous (iron) items.
In the Disc mode, the detector
will cause the threshold to be
‘blanked’ or silenced when the
coil is passed over a fairly
large ferrous target.
Field Test:
Trying to decide
where to test the GP was a tough
decision. I knew I would have to
choose the test site very
carefully, as it would be
crucial in determining the GP’s
performance. After consulting
with my father Steve, we finally
decided on what we thought was
our best ‘hunted out’ spot. Our
destination was a nugget patch
located in the desert southwest
of Quartzsite, AZ. This was not
an area that had been casually
hunted in the past by amateur
detectorists, oh no! This patch
had been tediously gridded,
scrapped and pounded to death by
some of the most successful
hunters in Arizona. That is why
we knew it was the ideal place
to test the GP.
It was early
morning when my father and I
finally reached the patch. We
decided that I would start off
in the immediate patch, while he
focused his efforts on the
surrounding hillsides. Since the
overburden was rather deep in
some areas, I decided that the
stock 18” coil would be the best
choice for maximum ground
coverage and depth penetration.
I was amazed how
much the patch had changed since
my last visit – it looked as if
it had been under siege by an
army of gophers! There were old
detector holes everywhere, a
majority of which appeared to be
the work of the SD series
machines. I slowly worked my way
across the patch without hitting
a single target until I reached
a promising bit of red stained
soil. As I passed the ‘trashcan
lid’ sized coil above it I
picked up a faint disturbance.
It wasn’t exactly a signal, but
the variation in the threshold
was enough to get my attention.
By the time the hole hit ten
inches the target was really
screaming. Finally it was out of
the ground and I began running
handfuls of dirt across the
coil. When the detector let out
a high-pitched squeal I knew it
was in my hand. Slowly I peeled
back my fingers and there in my
palm lay a chunky 4.3 gram
nugget!
A few feet away I
encountered a hefty boulder
partially submerged within the
soil. As I walked past I swept
the coil across its surface. The
rock was rather large and
cumbersome, but once out of the
way the signal got considerably
louder. After digging nearly six
inches I finally discovered what
was setting off the detector. It
was nothing more than a fragment
of rusted iron, probably part of
an old miner’s pick. Even though
it had not been gold, I was
utterly amazed that the GP had
been able to pick it up so
deeply beneath the rock.
Recovering the
next target was a difficult
task, as it was situated amongst
an old-timers drywash tailings
pile. The signal was a little
stronger than the others, but
not by much. After rummaging
through the loosely classified
material for nearly 15 minutes I
finally found what I was looking
for. Eureka! Another nugget had
been found, this time shaped
like a teardrop. I managed to
find a few more bits of rubbish
in the diggings, but no more
gold.
By now it was
late afternoon, so I decided to
check how my father was getting
along with his GP. “How’d you
do?” I asked. “Not too bad,” he
replied with a smile. He riffled
through his pockets and produced
a leather pouch, which he
immediately dumped out. Three
miniature lumps of yellow metal
rolled out into my waiting hand.
He informed me that all three
nuggets were found on the
outskirts of the patch with the
stock 11” coil at an average
depth of 5-6 inches.
Much to our
surprise the old patch had given
up another 5 nuggets, for a
total combined weight of 7.2
grams. Truthfully, I didn’t have
much hope of finding gold in
this particular location,
considering my father and I had
been over it no less than twenty
times – and there’s no telling
how many other hunters had been
over it. These results lead me
to believe that either the GP
was indeed outperforming the
earlier VLFs and SDs, or we were
EXTREMELY lucky.
Summary:
After finding a
fair amount of gold in a
well-hunted site, the GP extreme
has proven itself capable of
finding smaller gold than the
previous SD 2200d and punching
deeper than any other detector
on the market. Its new features,
ease of operation and uncanny
ability to knock out ground
mineralization make the GP an
extremely tough machine to beat.
While I would
highly recommend this machine to
anyone, I don’t want this to
come across as a sales pitch.
All I can offer you is my own
honest opinion. The GP extreme
is not without its flaws. The
cost for instance, is one
drawback that must be taken into
consideration. The GP carries a
suggested retail price of
$3,495.00, making it the single
most expensive gold detector on
the market. The increased weight
of the coils and general
bulkiness of the unit is
something a potential buyer
should also keep in mind. With
that out of the way, let me
close this article with one
final suggestion.
If you only get
the chance to go out detecting a
few times a year or are unsure
about your interests in
prospecting, I suggest you save
your money. The GP is a big
investment, so there’s no sense
shelling out that kind of cash
if it is going to sit at home
collecting dust. On the other
hand, if you are a serious
hunter with a passion for
detecting or are thinking about
becoming heavily involved with
prospecting, the GP is probably
the perfect machine for you. It
is equipped with the very latest
in detector technology and will
give you that extra edge where
it counts most – on the
goldfields!
For additional
information on the new GP
extreme or other Minelab
products, contact the factory at
Minelab USA Inc., 2700 E.
Patrick Lane, Suite 11, Las
Vegas, NV 89120; 888-517-2066 /
702-891-8809, or visit their
website at
www.minelab.com. |
|