|
Loaming for Gold
with a Metal Detector |
| |
|
Gold Prospector
Magazine |
|
Issue: May/June 2001 |
|
Author: Chris Gholson |
No
one knows for sure when gold was
first discovered, however we do
know that mankind has valued it
since the beginning of
civilization. In fact, it is the
first element mentioned in the
Bible (Genesis 2:10-12).
|
A river flowed
out of Eden to water
the garden,
|
|
and there it
divided and became
four rivers. The
name |
|
of the first is
Pishon; it is the
one which flows
around the |
|
whole land of
Havilah, where there
is gold, and the
gold |
|
of that land is
good. |
Perhaps while gathering
water, one of our ancient
ancestors noticed an unusual
stone shining amongst the
gravel. Upon picking it up, he
would have immediately noticed
its tremendous density. Later he
would have discovered how easily
it was manipulated into various
forms by pounding it with a
stone. Wandering back into camp
he might have shown others and
they too, taken back by its
aesthetic qualities, would have
set off to the river in hopes of
gathering more of this “ Gift
from the Gods. ” Thus
beginning man’s eternal
infatuation with gold.
It is true that in the
early days there was plenty of
gold to be had, but in reality
very little was known about the
geochemistry and deposition of
this precious metal. At one
point it was widely believed
that gold nuggets actually
formed in the creekbeds and
rivers. However, as the gold
rushes continued and expanded,
most of the accessible placers
were depleted. With their daily
wages growing increasingly
smaller, some of the miners
began to question this theory.
The discovery of quartz-gold
specimens only hastened their
pursuit of an alternate
explanation.
They had noticed that the
larger, rougher nuggets were
almost always found above the
fine gold, which typically
accumulated near the lower
reaches of creeks and rivers.
Putting two and two together,
they slowly formulated a
revolutionary new idea. They
suggested that gold nuggets did
not originate in the creekbeds,
but rather formed high in the
mountains and over time had been
transported downward to the
present-day waterways. Today
this concept seems only too
obvious, but back then it was a
tremendous breakthrough.
It appeared that gold and
quartz were somehow related, as
they were often found together.
The quartz with its gold was
occasionally found between
layers of rock which frequently
appeared as an outcrop from the
mountain slopes. It seemed to be
a simple matter of finding
quartz outcrops (Ballantyne
pp.22). However, these would-be
hardrock miners quickly realized
that very few quartz outcrops
carry gold.
These old-timers knew this
was a different kind of
prospecting than searching for
placer gold. By trial and error,
experience, and the exchange of
information, they developed a
method of prospecting for the
source of placer gold. Hence,
the art of loaming was born.
I first learned of the
loaming system while metal
detecting the goldfields of
Western Australia. In June of
1998 my father and I, along with
Larry (a seasoned Australian
detectorist), discovered a small
patch which yielded several
ounces of nuggets. After three
days of careful gridding the
patch was depleted, however on
several occasions I noticed
Larry gathering soil samples
along the base of a low lying
hill facing the patch. Each
night he would take the samples
over to a tub of water and pan
them out. One evening while
siting around the campfire I
asked Larry about the bags. He
replied that he was searching
for the source of the patch
gold, a process which he called
loaming.
After returning home to
Arizona my interest in loaming
continued to grow. I began
searching for information and
managed to find several
publications, however my
favorite was a small booklet
titled How to Prospect for
Hardrock Gold, by Verne H.
Ballantyne. It is well written,
easy to understand and retails
for less than $10.00.
Loaming is a method, which
was originally used to track
down the source of placer gold
in hopes of finding a lode
worthy of large scale mining. It
is a hands-on technique, which
relies heavily on the use of the
gold pan and good old-fashioned
hard work. However, I have
discovered that it can be a very
effective tool for narrowing
down the location of a potential
eluvial or hillside nugget
patch, especially when used in
conjunction with a modern metal
detector.
So what exactly is a nugget
patch anyway? A patch is nothing
more than an accumulation of
gold nuggets in a relatively
confined area. They are formed
by a variety of mechanical
processes, and can be found just
about anywhere within a
gold-bearing district. Patches
are often situated on the inside
bends above creeks, in open
flats, on the mesas between
creeks, and other times beneath
a gold-bearing outcrop.
The size of patch gold
varies greatly. It can be small,
medium, large or a mixture of
the three. I have a friend who
once discovered a patch and
detected over 400 nuggets not
much bigger than a match head!
He said, “ The whole patch only
produced a few ounces, but it
was one of the most exciting and
rewarding experiences I’ve ever
had with my metal detector. ” It
is true that most gold nuggets
are small, nevertheless the
possibility of finding a “ big
gold ” patch does exist. In
fact, I have seen patches in
Australia which have yielded
50-60 ounces, and the smallest
nugget tipped the scale at just
over an ounce!
Like size, the appearance
of patch gold will also vary.
This will depend upon how the
gold originated and how far it
has traveled from the source. If
the patch formed directly
beneath an outcrop, the nuggets
will most likely be coarse and
may be attached to some type of
host rock, like quartz. If the
patch was formed by the action
of an ancient stream or river,
the nuggets have probably been
transported a fair distance, and
are likely to be smooth and
polished.
So, when and where should a
person loam? I recommend that
you loam only once you have
established that a particular
gulch, gully, or wash carries
gold. This gold can be in the
form of nuggets, flakes or even
dust. At this point size doesn’t
matter, so long as we know that
gold is present.
The loaming technique can
be applied virtually anywhere.
However, as mentioned before, it
is best suited for those areas
which you already know contain
gold. Maybe you have a favorite
“ hot spot, ” that you enjoy
drywashing, or perhaps you know
of seasonal creek which is good
for dredging, panning or
highbanking. You may even be
lucky enough to know of a spot
that has yielded detectable
nuggets. Any of these areas will
work, as they all have potential
to contain nugget patches.
So, why would anyone go to
all the trouble of loaming? The
gold in the gully, creek or wash
must have shed from somewhere
nearby, couldn’t a person just
start detecting the hillsides?
Yes, but it would be like
searching for a needle in a
haystack. We must keep in mind
that the most patches only take
up a very small space, sometimes
no bigger than 5 sq. feet. The
hillsides and mountains on the
other hand, are much more vast.
For example, lets pretend
for a moment that I have just
discovered 2 ounces worth of
tiny nuggets in a dry creekbed.
I have cleaned the creek out
pretty well with my metal
detector, but have a feeling
there might be a patch close by.
I notice a few pieces of quartz
float on the hillside to my left
(an area covering about 80
acres), and immediately begin
hunting. I don’t really have a
clue where the gold shed from,
but figure, “ Hey, this hillside
is as good as any. ” So, how
long would it take me to hunt
all the ground?
To give you an idea, here
are some rough calculations
dealing with the amount of
ground the average detectorists
covers. Under absolutely ideal
conditions a person in good
health, using an 8” coil, who
carefully overlaps their sweeps
can cover approximately 1 sq.
foot per second. At this rate it
would take me 12 hours to
thoroughly search one acre! To
cover 80 acres it would take a
whopping 960 hours, or 40 days!
As you can see, I could spend
weeks or even months swinging a
coil and still never run across
a 5 sq. foot patch. Had I just
taken the time to loam I might
have saved myself from many
hours of fruitless labor.
As you can see, this type
of haphazard hunting is
definitely not the answer. In
fact, these numbers are probably
an under estimate, as I have not
factored in any time for digging
targets, water and bathroom
breaks, reground balancing, etc.
This is also assuming that the
ground is perfectly flat with no
obstructions, such as boulders,
cactus, brush, etc. Rarely do we
ever find gold-bearing ground
here in the U.S. that is
perfectly flat, let alone free
of natural obstructions.
Tracing the Colors
Loaming takes practice, but
is relatively easy once you get
the hang of it. Before the
loaming process is begun, you
must first decide where to begin
searching. Lets say you have
chosen a narrow gully somewhere
in western Arizona that has
produced gold in the past. The
gully, which is approximately 15
foot wide runs for about a half
mile before dumping into a
larger wash. There is very
little overburden and it
contains abundant black sands.
Start off in the lower
reaches of the gully, near the
point of intersection with the
wash. Then use a metal detector
(preferably one designed
exclusively for nugget hunting)
to search any portions of the
bedrock which are exposed.
Rough, jagged bedrock with
plenty of cracks; such as those
composed of schist and slate;
are better suited for trapping
gold. Avoid spending too much
time on those sections which
have been worn smooth. They will
invariably have a slick polished
appearance and are not likely to
catch and retain gold very well.
If nuggets begin turning
up, continue working your way up
the gully until no more gold is
found. Make a rough sketch of
the gully, its tributaries and
the surrounding hills. You can
use a 7.5 minute topographic map
in conjunction with your sketch,
however many small waterways are
not always represented on these
maps. Be as detailed as
possible, as your sketch will be
crucial in helping you find the
patch.
After you have finished
your field map you will need to
plot the approximate locations
of the nuggets, especially the
last (or highest) piece. Jot
down a brief description of the
nuggets (i.e., appearance, size,
weight, etc.) on a separate
sheet of paper.
Now comes the next step in
our quest for the patch. Make
your way back to where the last
piece of gold was found - this
is the most important clue we
have so far. Now we will begin
to take the first of many
samples. With crevicing tool,
shovel and canvas bags in hand,
walk about 25 feet past the area
where the last nugget was found
and take a sample. If the
bedrock is exposed, remove the
gravel, soil, clay and other
material contained within the
cracks and place it in your bag.
If the bedrock is not exposed,
dig down as close to it as
possible and gather your sample.
I like to screen the material
with an 1/4 inch classifier
prior to filling the bag. The
classifier will eliminate the
larger overburden and allow more
material to be collected.
Continue taking samples (each
about 25 feet apart) until you
reach the uppermost portion, or
headwaters of the gully.
After taking a sample it is
absolutely crucial that you
label the bags, mark their
location in the gully with a
marker and plot them on your
map. I cannot stress the
importance of this step enough.
After all, what good is a
gold-bearing sample if you don’t
know where it came from?
Once the samples have been
collected it is time to pan them
out. The bags should be panned
individually, watching for
traces of fine gold. Log the
results of each and every
sample, regardless of the
outcome. Then highlight on your
map the location of the last
sample which tested positive for
gold.
For example:
Sample # 4
Location:
Yavapai County, AZ - dry gully
Description:
material taken from exposed
schist bedrock, 4 small colors
found in pan.
Date:
5/17/2001
Attention should be given
to the appearance of this gold.
What do these gold particles
look like? Are they flat,
smooth, rough; do they have any
attached host rock? These
questions can be answered by
examining the colors under a
microscope. Personally, I use a
Panasonic FF-393E hand-held
light scope. As a rule, the
larger and more angular the
gold, the closer you are to the
source.
You will now have to go
back to the location of the last
gully sample which produced
color, it is here that we will
begin collecting our hillside
samples. At this point we must
choose which side of the gully
to begin searching, this should
only be done after a thorough
examination of each hillside has
been made. Look for areas of
different colored rock, traces
of free-quartz float, rusty soil
and black iron-rich stones. If
one of the hillsides exhibits
these potential gold indicators
begin here. If neither do, just
go with your instincts.
Once a side has been
chosen, go back to the gully and
walk approximately 25 feet up
the hill at a 90-degree angle
and take a sample. Dig down 6-12
inches into the soil, fill your
sample bag with this material
and number it. Then pound a
wooden stake or other marker
next to the hole with the same
number on it.
From here more samples will
have to be collected parallel to
the gully. Repeat the same
process as above, spacing them
25 feet apart. At least six
samples should be taken on each
side of the original hillside
sample. Be sure that you label
each of the bags and the
location from which they came.
The hillside samples are
now ready to be panned. As
before, watch for traces of
color. Plot each of these sample
locations on your map, highlight
those which tested positive and
make a note as to which bag
produced the most gold. If none
of the samples produced gold, it
is safe to assume that the gold
must have shed from the opposite
hillside, and the process will
have to repeated once again.
Of the twelve samples, the
one that showed the most colors
should be considered the center
line. Now return to the hill and
move about 25 feet directly
above this center, and take
another series of samples, each
parallel to the center. Label
the bags, holes and once again
pan them for color. Continue
this process up the face of the
hillside until no more gold is
found.
Now you are ready to begin
hunting the hillside. If you
have highlighted the location of
the hillside samples on your map
which tested positive for gold,
you will hopefully see they have
formed an inverted “V.”
This is the “ spread ” or
pattern that gold and most other
materials will follow as they
erode from a vein and scatter on
the hillside below. Gold is
seldom found without quartz,
however because of its low
density, quartz will have a
tendency to travel further than
gold. Therefore, quartz may or
may not be found in a nugget
patch.
Commence detecting just
above the last hillside sample
which had color. Slowly work
your way down, keeping an eye
out for any old-timer diggings,
rotten or stained quartz and
shallow depressions caused by
the flow of water. Keep the coil
as low to the ground as
possible, overlap your sweeps,
and work in and around the
brush. And lastly, lets cross
our fingers and hope that you
are only minutes away from
finding a big nugget patch!
Keep in mind that loaming
is not a sure thing. While the
technique has been proven over
the centuries, there is no
guarantee that it will always
lead you to a patch. Many times
there will be no patch,
regardless of how much gold was
found in the gully, creek, or
wash. The formation of patches
is controlled largely by a
region’s geology, climate and
topography. If the hillsides
surrounding a creek are
extremely steep, all the gold
may have eroded downward into
the creek, never forming a
patch. On the other hand, if the
area surrounding the creek is
composed of gently sloping hills
the larger gold may have become
hung up or trapped on its
downward journey, and never
reached the creekbed below. It
is in these areas that you have
the best odds of locating a
detectable nugget patch.
Last year I loamed several
gold-bearing gullies and creeks
in central Arizona, which at one
time, contained abundant
nuggets. For days I tromped the
brushy hillsides gathering soil
samples here and there. While I
never found the patch, I was
able to gain some much needed
experience. This year I tried it
out once again, only this time I
didn’t leave empty handed.
On a chilly afternoon,
after loaming for several days,
my luck finally changed. While
wandering across a creosote
covered slope my detector let
out a high pitched squeal. I
didn’t pay the target much
attention, as I had already dug
about 35 pieces of trash earlier
that morning. Once out of the
ground, I was pleased to
discover that it was actually a
rough, quartz-studded nugget.
And from what I could tell it
had not traveled far. A few
minutes later I picked up three
more, which were equally rough.
I continued searching back and
forth, but alas the gold had
vanished. Feeling a little
disappointed I trudged my way up
the slope until it eventually
flattened out. What happened
next is hard to describe.
As I began sweeping my coil
the detector went berserk, it
was apparent that the ground was
littered with buried targets! My
first instinct was that the
targets were nothing more than
birdshot, but after digging the
first signal I realized they
were indeed gold nuggets. I
couldn’t believe this was
happening, it just seemed too
good to be true. By nightfall I
had accumulated a handful of the
precious metal, the biggest of
which was 1.2 ounces. Two days
later I left with 7 ounces of
gold in my pocket and a big
smile on my face! Amazingly, all
of the nuggets were found in a
30’ x 12’ (L x W) area. I would
have never found this gold, had
I not used the loaming system.
The loaming system really
does work, and with a little
practice and dedication, it will
work for you too. I wish you the
very best of luck with all your
prospecting.
References
Ballantyne, Verne H., 1981. How
to Prospect for Hardrock Gold,
Mountain Publications. Maine.
Cash, S.J., 1975. Loaming for
Gold, Hesperian Press. Western
Australia.
Petralia, Joseph F., 1982. Gold!
Gold! A Beginners Handbook and
Recreational Guide, Sierra
Trading Post. California. |